Robyn Carr’s Virgin River (the series) — a commentary.

23 Jan

Virgin RiverOnce again, this is not a review. I’m not going to give a summary, or even the back cover blurb, for any of the novels in this long (oh my good lord, looooooooooong!) series¹. This is basically a bunch of incoherent musings inspired by this and this conversations over at Dear Author, and the fact that I found myself re reading the first few of the Virgin River books.

My feelings about these books are rather mixed. There are many things that bother me about them–some of them fairly subtle, some of them quite in your face–but then there are others that resonate with me in a very positive way. In the end, I can’t recommend any of them wholeheartedly, but neither can I condemn them as wallbangers/DNF.

Since it is not a review, please do keep in mind that there are plenty of spoilers for the series within–and a lot of pointed criticism.

Reader, beware…

To begin with, there’s the fact that these books are, at their core, a long running soap opera (which is rather funny, since a couple of the minor characters are two middle age friends who have watched the same soap opera, together, every week day for over fifteen years).

However, and contrary to most soaps (or what little I know of them, as I’ve never watched more than a couple of episodes of any, in any of the places I’ve lived), this one is a “feel good” soap. People who are together stay together, and all obstacles are overcome. Infertile women become pregnant by the right man–after years of fertility treatment with the wrong partner, of course. And this happens so often in the region that we meet three other women on the same position in book 1². Victims of abuse and/or rape regain their confidence and are protected and secure in the love of…yeah, that would be the right man. Again.

But the series is totally a soap opera, because a couple of novels down the road, that same infertile woman with the magic pregnancy then has to have an emergency hysterectomy and becomes obsessed with adopting a baby–while having a biological toddler and infant.

We are told over and over, at least twice each book, how Virgin River is such a beautiful and peaceful place. Jack, the hero of the first novel (aptly titled Virgin River), even tells Melinda the heroine, that he moved there because it had “good family values”³–which he knows right off because…

He’s psychic?

Because it’s a small town, so of course it has good family values?

And yet, in this oh so peaceful and idyllic place where people don’t lock their doors, we find pot growers, serial rapists, hard drug pushers, domestic violence, raging alcoholism, teen pregnancy, and assorted other ills of society–some of them every other book–all of them overcome–repeatedly–by the current and previous heroes and heroines. This is so ridiculous as to be addressed by several characters at different point in the series, unconvincingly as far as I’m concerned. My feeling is that Ms Carr felt the need to keep throwing obstacles/baggage/shit at the characters in an attempt to make their stories more interesting and/or provide external conflict, since there is little realistic internal conflict after each pair gets their HEA.4

The novels are written with multiple stories running concurrently, and occasionally tangentially, to each other. The four protagonists of book 7 are introduced in book 1, as relatively minor characters throughout the series whose own issues have varying degrees of impact on those stories. In the case of Paul and Vanessa, protagonists of book 5, their story (or rather, the set up for it) takes up a good chunk of the last third of book 3–much more than plain sequel baiting, it does feel as each book is an episode in the general saga. However, contrary to series such as Nalini Singh’s Psy/Changeling, where there is an overarching story thread that leads you somewhere, these episodes have no greater purpose. It’s just a never ending line up of disasters, near disasters, violence, pregnancies and marriages.

Yeah, no man is an island and in this little community5 everyone’s life touches everyone else’s life, whatever, the whole thing feels more than a bit contrived and, well, soap operaish. Mind you, you still want to know what happens next–like any good soap opera, correct?

Ms Carr’s heroes are perfect fantasy fodder, but so utterly and absolutely perfect I grow a bit annoyed with them. And, considering that most of them are either former military or law enforcement, ridiculously delicate in their language. I mean, we have adult couples using phrases such as, “doing it” instead of “having sex” (let alone fucking). In fact, I don’t believe any of the characters even think the word sex as it relates to their own relationships6 until sometime late in book 3. The good guys are thoroughly good. Even when she tries her hand at some ambiguity with Dan–former pot grower and convict–and at redemption with Cheryl–former town lush–the fact is that any reader who has stuck with the series long enough to reach their story (Paradise Valley, book 7) already knows they are good people at heart, their flaws and peccadilloes forgivable and forgettable.

So the utopia aspect of the setting is there, but then there are all sorts of subtle patriarchal thinking sneaking into the novels. The men are men–it’s all about hunting, fishing and reading (non-fiction, of course). They are all adoring of the women they love, lusting after their very pregnant (or just delivered wives) in a most unrealistic way, all hell-bent on protecting the little ladies. There’s a lot of lip service to how strong the women are, how smart and what have you, but underneath it all, it’s about the men protecting the womenfolk.

For example, in Shelter Mountain–second novel, battered wife–when Paige is kidnapped by her husband, who is intent on committing a very neat murder-suicide (right after getting rid off the hero, of course), we are told how much stronger she’s become since arriving to Virgin River, how brave she is. So, what does she do?

She doesn’t fight, doesn’t try to escape, doesn’t do shit but know her man will come for her. Okay, she doesn’t lose it and throws a hysterics fit, but neither does she act–even her thoughts are passive. And then she is rescued by about six strong, big, armed men, and all we see of her strength is that she doesn’t cry out when the tape that’s over her mouth is ripped off.

(Can you tell this drove me up the wall with rage?)

Then, in book 3, we have the hero of Mexican descent, who of course plays the Spanish guitar–not the fucking acoustic guitar, mind you, and speaks lies to the heroine in Spanish–not knowing that she’s also fluent in the language. Which, oh for the love of all that’s irksome and infuriating, brings me to a topic I’ve brought up at least a couple of times before: it’s not that fucking difficult to find a person who is truly fluent in the language you want. Because, let me tell you, what Miguel/Mike and Brie say to each other? Looks like one of those online translator jobs further massacred by an eager copy editor.7

(Yes, this is yet another hot button with me, how did you ever guess?)

Okay, so this is already a rather insanely long post and nothing but hate for the series so far. So let’s go into the things that I’ve enjoyed, shall we?

In the first book, we have two teenagers, both virgins, having sex with each other for the first time and, predictably, fucking the pooch by by-passing the condom. Pregnancy is the obvious and most dramatic result. And when, in book 2, Rick finally learns that yes, Liz is pregnant with his baby, we have this passage:

(summary of background: when she tells him she’s not pregnant, he suggest they cool it off–she’s 14 and he 16, after all. She thinks he’s gotten what he wanted and is no longer interested, then she realized she is pregnant and has to tell him. Rick’s thoughts are in italics, the emphasis as is in the book)

“Stop. You didn’t do anything wrong,” he said, ashamed of how he’d made her feel. … he told her they should cool it, not see each other anymore. He told her he cared about her, but holy God–they obviously couldn’t control themselves. And they were both too young to get caught with a baby. Except no, they weren’t.

He pulled her into his arms. “Oh, Liz, baby,” he said, “I broke it off to keep you safe.” To keep me safe! “I didn’t want to lose control again and get you in trouble.” Get me in trouble! “You are so young! Too young!” I’m too young!

This one character, in this one moment, reacts like an actual human being. He’s trying to support the girl, but he’s also thinking about himself–he’s flawed, he’s young, he’s confused, he’s scared. And we truly feel all of this going on with him.

There are enough moments like this one, enough passages like this, to make me care about the characters even when I lose patience with the series when the next piano falls on their heads.

Being privy to the heroes’ internal dialogue we see that they are insecure about their own worth–in the eyes of the heroine. They know who they are and, within their usual circle, they are confident in their skills and proud of their accomplishments. But when it comes to winning the love of the woman they love, they are insecure. They examine their past choices with different, less self-satisfied eyes, and often find themselves wanting. They want to be–and to have been–better, for her. Because in their eyes she could do so much better, they just don’t deserve her. Let alone her love.

And this is a lovely bit of fantasy, isn’t it? To have that one person who sees you at your worst moments, who knows all your flaws and all your regrets, and still–still!–feels privileged to love you? (how cool would it be if this feeling were truly mutual, huh?) And we continue to see the heroes, after winning fair maiden, willing to accommodate her quirks and go to great lengths to make her happy–because making her truly happy makes them happy.

Part of this fantasy is the high regard in which all the heroes hold women–not just their heroines, sisters, mothers, friends, but all women. For example, in Virgin River, Jack breaks off a friends with benefits relationship shortly after meeting Mel, not because he thinks he has a chance with Mel but because it’s not fair to Charmaine for Jack to have sex with her while wanting someone else.

In Whispering Rock a young girl confesses to her boyfriend that she’s not a virgin, and his first reaction is extremely positive. Talking about victims of rape, this same young man is firmly on the “she’s innocent, the violence was done to her, she didn’t do any single solitary thing to bring that ugliness into her life” camp. (Would that more people of both genders actually felt that way.)

In Second Chance Pass, the hero and his friend with benefits get pregnant8 and he doesn’t for one moment blame her for having sex with him–or indeed, with other people. He considers her a nice person and a perfectly respectable woman, period. Even Cheryl, town lush and much later one of the heroines in Paradise Valley, is never looked at with contempt or disdain but more with a sort of baffled pity and frustration at their inability to help her.

All the heroes in the series put their heroines’ wishes and well being before their own, but more than that, they respect the heroines’ choices. They may at times feel, strongly, that it’s not the right choice, but they will respect that choice and support the heroine.

When the teenage girl in book 2 wants to keep the baby, the hero and his role models (Jack and Preacher) go against conventional wisdom (it’s better for mother, father and baby if the latter is given up for adoption), because the mother is so obviously coming apart at the seams at the thought of not keeping the baby. When Brie decides to quit her work as prosecutor after her rape (by a rapist she had prosecuted without securing conviction), not one of the males in the novels criticizes her decision or suggest less-stressful (lesser?) careers for her. They give her time to heal first and to face her own future, in her own terms.

This to the core respect, even when mixed with a bit of “women need protection” mentality, is important and refreshing–there is a reason so many male protagonists in romance genre novels are referred to as alpholes, after all 9.

Then there’s the sex.

Yes, oh yes there is.

The sex scenes are plenty passionate even though Ms Carr manages to maintain PG13 language throughout. The scene doesn’t fade to black, the door doesn’t close, graphic language never makes an appearance and yet, I can totally buy that these two characters are thoroughly in lust with each other.

So, there you have it, a mixed bag. Enough good that I’ve read most of the series, enough issues to irk me as I read.

~~~ * ~~~

¹Readers familiar with J. D. Robb / Nora Roberts will notice that Virgin River is barely half the length of In Death–yet it honestly seems much longer. My take? It’s because Ms Carr does not let any Jack and Melinda just freaking be–there has to be something terrible, momentous, significant, what have you, rocking their world in every single book. Seriously, give it a rest already, please.

² Keep in mind that this series is tied/a spin off from a previous trilogy by Ms Carr, set in Grace Valley–just a short distance from Virgin River.

³ Never mind that he’s a confirmed bachelor, just out after 20+ years in the Marines, whose ideal retirement consists of hunting and fishing, while owning a bar. So…why exactly would he give a fig about the values held by his neighbors?

4 Please do keep in mind that I do not claim to know whether Ms Carr thought/felt this or not–I’m just stating my impression as I read.

5 Though, how funny, only about three protagonists throughout the series are actually native to the town. Everyone else has a reason–escaping an abusive relationship, recovering from being shot, dealing with grief (lather, rinse, repeat…)–to come to this peaceful and idyllic hotbed of sin and crime.

6 Mel, first heroine and main character throughout the series, does use the word when thinking/talking about her vocation as midwife

7 For those who give a damn (all the passages below are taken from page 226 in Whispering Rock, book 3–I didn’t feel like combing the book from the beginning; my head was already about to explode with this page alone) The pseudo-Spanish passages are in italics and followed by an English translation, also in italics.

Para amarte durante la noche is translated to “to love me through the night.” You see those two little letters in bold, though? those mean that the action is directed at the other person, not the speaker. So what Brie says there is, “to love YOU throughout the night”

Nada is translated as “not one” (secret) *cue sound of frustration* Isn’t this one of those Spanish words most people have at least a passing acquaintance with? Nada means nothing, and the correct word for “not one” is ninguno/ninguna (in this case, the masculine, since they are talking about secretos).

Tu debes sentir esas manos amorosas así a tí is translated as “you should feel the touch of loving hands.” Okay, this one kills me. First, the sentence does make no fucking sense in Spanish. Even if someone argues that the correct phrasing has a phonetic resemblance to the above bullshit, it still doesn’t mean what the translation says it means. You want to say, “you should feel the touch of loving hands” then you say, Deberías semtir el toque de manos amantes/amorosas. And even then, gramatically correct as it is, it does not convey the same feeling. For that, you say, Sólo manos amantes deberían tocar tu piel.

Deje a que sean sus manos is translated as “please let it be your hands” *brief shriek* First off, no fluent Spanish speaker would construct such a phrase, let alone drop an extra, one letter word in the middle of it (a). Second, both verb and article (sus) mean that Brie is using the formal address with her lover–in bed, during sex. Way to go, kids.

8 Though I confess that this particular plot point sticks in my throat–yet another miracle, one strike, one hole pregnancy. Seriously, people, we know it only takes one sperm, but not every time a couple are careless the result is pregnancy. Enough already, please.

 9 Make that, many reasons.


19 Responses to “Robyn Carr’s Virgin River (the series) — a commentary.”

  1. twooldfartstalkingromance 23/01/2013 at 9:21 AM #

    I’ve been wondering about the series because I do have a yearning for small town romances (I rather love the Kristan Higgins books that are all small town) but I thought they might be Christian and that tires me out after awhile (Debbie Macomber on my mind).

    So thanks for this. I know I won’t bother because I will not like.

    • azteclady 23/01/2013 at 3:47 PM #

      I’m leaning towards re reading the few Jill Shalvises I have–mind you, I don’t have too many because of cost, the ones I’ve read I’ve totally enjoyed (and should review, now that I think about it). Another author who does really good contemporary, small town? Shannon Stacey. I really, really enjoyed the Kowalskis (and, hey, isn’t the first one free right now?)

  2. kaetrin 24/01/2013 at 6:15 AM #

    I didn’t know about the Spanish but otherwise I can only completely agree. I’m behind on the series but I do nevertheless have much love for the first three in particular, flaws and all. I have most of the books, many on my tbr. I think I’m worried that continuing might make me have less of the love!

    • azteclady 24/01/2013 at 4:47 PM #

      I hesitate to discourage you from continuing on, yet…let’s say I’m re reading book 5 and struggling not to slap Paul, Vannesa and other assorted characters, starting on chapter oh…three?

      • kaetrin 24/01/2013 at 11:38 PM #

        I think I’m up to the one where Mel loses her mind and wants to have another baby somehow even though she’s already got a toddler and a baby but I can’t remember which number that is or the title. Is it Paradise something or other? 🙂

  3. Brie C. (@racblog) 24/01/2013 at 8:57 AM #

    This post made me smile, because it clearly explains why I keep coming back for more even though more than half the time the books infuriate me. But once every five book, we get a truly good one, and I just can’t quit it.

    I think the Virgin River books have the same problem most small-town contemporaries have – a utopic, romantic and very much fantastic view of what small-town life is like, as well as a deep anti-big city message that’s borderline propagandistic.

    The latest books have toned down a bit on the babies and the heroic main characters saving the miserable locals, although I DNF’d the latest Christmas novel for doing just that. I was deeply offended and even considered quitting the books. There are also less babies and pregnancies, and less Mel and Jack. Some of the books have completely new characters that in no way relate to the original books, and it felt like a breath of fresh air.

    Great post! I have so many mixed feelings about this series, and about small-town contemporary romance in general, but there’s something that I find so appealing, that I can’t stop reading them despite the negative feelings they sometime evoke.

    • azteclady 24/01/2013 at 4:50 PM #

      a deep anti-big city message that’s borderline propagandistic.

      Oh my, yes, this!

      For a hermit like me, who really values keeping to herself after growing up in a large and close knit family (five siblings, about a hundred cousins, etc), there is something almost claustrophobic about everyone knowing everyone else’s business.

      And yet, at the same time, it’s very appealing to think that there would be people who wouldn’t know walk by, averting their eyes, if something happened to you.

  4. Liza Wiemer (@LizaWiemer) 09/11/2013 at 10:28 PM #

    Note to anyone reading this: Potential spoilers regarding characters Mel and Jack.

    Thank you so much for your comments. I read the first book in the series today and loved it. But after reading reviews (spoilers that weren’t noted as spoilers) about what transpires between Mel and Jack in future books, I *gulp* think, for now, I’ll just leave the two of them in happy bliss and write my own happily-ever-after for them in my head. It’s hard for me to believe that Mel turns into such an unlikeable character, but respect the author for doing what she feels is best for her story/characters/series. Obviously, there are many other beloved characters from Virgin River other than Mel and Jack, but since they were the first . . . I’m not ready to have my heart broken. I had planned on reading one book after the other, but I will give myself some time to detach before I pick up another one. I would love to know what you thought about Mel and Jack in future books.
    I love Jill Shalvis – Lucky Harbor series.

    • azteclady 09/11/2013 at 10:57 PM #

      I’m glad to be of help.

      Interesting that you mention Jill Shalvis, as I’m right now finishing a re-read of Rescue My Heart. I generally do enjoy her stories (with one rather glaring exception–see my review of Get a Clue by her). However, the books don’t grab me the same way during a re-read. She’s one of the rare authors I like well enough during the first read to grade above a 7.50, yet feel extremely meh if/when I try to re-read. Weird, huh?

      • Liza Wiemer (@LizaWiemer) 09/11/2013 at 11:26 PM #

        I rarely reread books, maybe just favorite sections in a book, appreciating a scene or something that touched me emotionally. I read a lot of different books, memoirs, YA, adult fiction, non-fiction, romance – mostly because I am a hopeless romantic at heart. But given that my reading time is so limited, I only revisit favorites sparingly. If I happen to finish a novel that I absolutely loved, that’s when I’ll reread favorite sections.
        I’m feeling ridiculously torn about Mel and Jack. To continue or not . . . that is the question. :/

  5. J.R. 29/01/2014 at 12:21 AM #

    Jack’s wife’s name is Melinda, not Melanie.

    • azteclady 29/01/2014 at 8:45 AM #

      I thought I had fixed that! Could you tell me where I missed it? I just looked it over again and can’t find it. Thank you!

  6. Audrey 01/04/2016 at 8:19 PM #

    I read the entire series and found most of them quite enjoyable. They are exactly the type of stories I expected, set in small town romance books. I’ve been reading romance books for over 50 years and have no complaints. I like the fact that there was no explicit sex and limited swear words.

    • azteclady 01/04/2016 at 8:54 PM #

      To each his or her own, obviously. Welcome to my corner of the intra-tubes.

  7. Monika 09/07/2016 at 4:08 AM #

    Just came over from Wicked Scribes and “our” language usage discussion. I like this text type: rant with footnotes 😉
    I have to admit that – aside from the language usage issue – your description / assessment of the series doesn’t induce the slightest wish in me to read if for myself and leaves me wondering why you bothered to stick with it for so long…

    • azteclady 09/07/2016 at 6:09 AM #

      I’m a glutton for punishment?

      Kidding aside, I think it was the cumulative effect that did me in, particularly on re-reads; the first two or three weren’t that incredibly terrible.

      (Welcome to my humble online abode–and thank you)

  8. Bona 10/01/2017 at 1:53 PM #

    I was looking for a different thing but I found this post in your post and read it because this is one of those series I’ve never read but I’m wondering if it could interest me.
    And really, the part about Spanish language? LOL! I can’t believe it because as you say, it must be easy to find someone who can check it. It’s not like you are going to write something in Basque or Romansh or anything like that.
    I have seen mistakes like those you mention in other books, as well and yes, it can make me leave that book.
    Anyway, after reading your post, I’m not sure this is a good series for me. It sounds a little bit too conservative for my tastes.

    • azteclady 10/01/2017 at 2:45 PM #

      Yes, it has an undercurrent of “traditional values are better” (where men where men and women lived to have children and tend their families). Even when outwardly the heroines are not just allowed but encouraged to have careers, they are expected to be super women and do everything else too.


  1. Yesterday’s Gone, by Janice Kay Johnson | Her Hands, My Hands - 03/07/2017

    […] Johnson does a great job with small towns that aren’t idealized à la Virgin River. There is crime and poverty and social dysfunction, even though it’s in a much smaller scale […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: