Tag Archives: FunnyJunk

Ah, what tangled webs! Stupid and vindictive against the might of the internet.

2 Jul

Well, the convoluted tale of stupidity continues.

Charles Carreon amended his suit against Matthew Inman, IndieGoGo, the Wildlife Federation Foundation and the American Cancer Association, apparently to try and make the suit relevant in some way by…making California’s Attorney General a plaintiff defendant in it?

Huh…

Apparently Mr Carreon, a self-styled internet-savvy attorney, wasn’t very familiar with the Streisand Effect. Up until now, that is–what with ArsTechnica, Boing Boing, Popehat, The Legal Satyricon, Lowering the Bar, and a number of other blogs picking up the story, anyone with even a passing interest in Free Speech has by now at the very least heard about the suit.

We can consider Mr Carreon educated on the workings of the internet now–a day late and a few dollars short, if you ask me.

However…

Not deterred (or perhaps spurred) by the amazing success of the BearLove Good, Cancer Bad campaign in the face of his shenanigans, Charles Carreon filed for temporary restraining order, so that IndieGoGo couldn’t disburse the monies raised to Matthew Inman. Except, maybe, if IndieGoGo did what Carreon wanted without delay, then he (Carreon) would drop the matter.

I repeat: Huh?

(I know, right?)

Anyway…

Perhaps you are one of the few who don’t know that, a few days ago, the Electronic Frontier Foundation joined Matthew Inman’s defense team. They have issued a truly awesome release here¹.

For your entertainment, choice tidbits that tickled me: Continue reading

What happens when an idiot pisses the internet off?

27 Jun

(See update at the end)

Nine times out of ten, the internet makes something good out of it.

Because the internet is made out of people, and while it’s the asshats and douchebags who, squeaky rodents that they are, make much of the noise, the silent majority tends to be better–much better–than that.

So when ill-informed (and it would seem, ill-advised himself) attorney Charles Carreon demands that Matthew Inman of The Oatmeal send a check for $20,000.00, the latter appeals to his readers and raises more than that in a matter of minutes for the American Cancer Society and the National Wildlife Federation.

When butthurt attorney Charles Carreon sues Matthew Inman, IndieGoGo and both of the charities in question, because (paraphrasing) “charities should only receive money donated out the purest of motives,” the amount donated grows exponentially, to the point that when the fundraiser closed the final amount was about eleven times the original goal.

And when Matthew Inman decides to stick to the original plan and divide the final amount between only those two charities, someone else picks up the standard for two other charities.

Donate. Participate. Defend your right to say “fuck you” in any way you want, under the protection of the first amendment of the constitution of the United States. Continue reading

A tale of the stupid: The Oatmeal, FunnyJunk and Charles Carreon (via Dear Author)

18 Jun
Reposted in toto with full permission from Dear Author (because I really can’t improve on it):

~ ~ * ~ ~

The Oatmeal is a satiric cartoon site run by Matthew Inman. About a year ago, he noticed that his content was being uploaded without attribution to a site called “The FunnJunk.” The FunnyJunk is a site that contains user generated content. This means that account holders post things that they like from all over the internet. Maybe a pre-Pinterest sort of site. The Oatmeal writes to the FunnyJunk requesting that the information be removed.

FunnyJunk took down the comics but proceeded to create a mirror image of The Oatmeal’s website. The Oatmeal responded by asking his readers what to do.

The FunnyJunk responded with a call to action to its own users asking them to inundate The Oatmeal’s inbox and facebook page. The FJ’s users responded in droves using their arsenal of retorts such as gay slurs and incoherently misspelled sentences to insult The Oatmeal and his biological predecessors for having the gall to procreate and, I guess, learn how to spell and draw.

According to Ars Technica, after the furor died down, the FJ admin acted somewhat responsibly, possibly realizing that its site could be in jeopardy due to all the copyrighted material illegally reposted there. Continue reading